| |
| |
| ||||
|
That is exactly what I was going to ask. On the "Phal spiking yet" thread I posted a new growth that looked kind of chunky and seemed low for a spike and thought I would be a keiki. It since turns out it is a spike. (pretty sure) |
| The Following User Says Thank You to lmartiny For This Useful Post: | ||
whalloper (09-28-2009) | ||
| ||||
|
We've been through the subject/discussion once previously as to whether a basal "growth" on a phalaenopsis should be called nothing more than a "growth" or a "keiki". The reality is that no matter how much some people disagree as to what the terminology SHOULD be - it is called BOTH by newbies and orchid authorities alike. Whether it comes from a node on a flower spike or a basal growth the potential end result is the same - an exact genetic duplicate of the mother plant..... I vote for calling either whichever you like - unlike Kevin I choose to call the basal growth a keiki like the spike "growth".
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mayres For This Useful Post: | ||
whalloper (09-28-2009) | ||
| ||||
|
Since keiki is the Hawaiian word for baby, I suspect taxonomists did not use this word when originally describing any orchid. I think we the general public use it as a term of convenience to describe a growth from an unusual location. Brooke |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Brooke For This Useful Post: | ||
whalloper (09-28-2009) | ||
| |||
|
Brooke, I think you are correct. As I was struggling in another thread to define what a keiki was, I actually dug out my handbook called Descriptive Teminology for the Orchid Judge - it basically defines all the words used to describe orchids. This is what they have for keiki - Hawaiian, meaning an immature plant, offshoot or new growth - not much help huh? But I agree the common usage of the word is as you wrote. BTW interestingly the plural for keiki is keikes.
__________________ Renee "I carefully described to Huxley the shooting out of the pollinia in Catasetum, and received for an answer, 'Do you really think I can believe all that?'" - Darwin, 1868 |
| The Following User Says Thank You to rcb For This Useful Post: | ||
whalloper (09-28-2009) | ||
| ||||
|
It is sort of shaped like a spike, which was my first guess. After looking some more, I guess a new growth, or keiki, or whatever they're calling it. The new growth is lower down than the existing spike, and also lower than the other keiki. I don't think spikes form lower down, I've never seen it happen. I've always seen new spikes form higher up than the previous ones.
__________________ Sarah I go gaga for spotted orchids |
| The Following User Says Thank You to trinigirl For This Useful Post: | ||
whalloper (09-29-2009) | ||
| ||||
|
Hard to see as the pic is out of focus, but it looks like it. Just allow it to continue to grow and it will eventually start growing roots as well. When they are about 1.5-2 inches long you can remove and put it up as a "free" duplicate of the mother plant! Have fun! Last edited by mayres; 09-29-2009 at 06:07 PM. Reason: typo |
| The Following User Says Thank You to mayres For This Useful Post: | ||
krpot (09-29-2009) | ||
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this a spike or keiki? | scrampbell | Newbie Questions | 1 | 10-15-2008 11:34 AM |
| root, spike or keiki? | pikevi | Orchid Care Cultivation | 7 | 09-28-2007 08:12 AM |
| My first keiki | pikevi | Orchid Care Cultivation | 17 | 09-11-2007 10:06 PM |
| | | | | | | | | |