Thread: Walkeriana
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 07:52 PM
kmarch's Avatar
kmarch kmarch is offline
Chief Of Staff
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 5,455
Thanks: 3
Thanked 75 Times in 57 Posts
kmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLu View Post
Well Kevin I agree with the response that using the name "var" implies a scientific name, but if someone chooses to give a plant a hort (fictitious) name there is nothing preventing them from making it appear "scientific". Heck, it happens constantly.
Sadly you're right. There's nothing to prevent them from being dishonest and deceptive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLu View Post
In addition, the original post did not indicate the use of "var". That was my addition to indicate that I was looking for a scientific name and a real variety rather than a hype name.
Ah ok, I didn't pick up on that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLu View Post
I did not look. You might find "var delicatum" in some taxonomy system, but it is not recognized by the orchid registrar at this time nor in the past. That does not mean it is not on the World Monocot Checklist.
I checked Monocot's and there is no reference to var. delicatum neither recognized nor obsolete and I've not found any botanical description bearing the name var delicatum. Between your checking an mine, I'm inclined to think there's no such thing.
__________________
Reply With Quote