Thread: It came!! :D
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2007, 06:49 PM
kmarch's Avatar
kmarch kmarch is offline
Chief Of Staff
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 5,643
Thanks: 6
Thanked 123 Times in 84 Posts
kmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by pikevi View Post
Is that the accepted way of writing the name Dendrobium amabile syn furcatum ,where the current accepted name apears as syn.? Or should it have been Dendrobium furcatum syn. amabile?
It is not the accepted way of writing the name. As I stated above, the word "synonym" and/or the abbreviation "syn" are not parts of a plant's botanical name and they should not be used. Only the correct, recognized name, in this case Dendrobium furcatum, should be used. Synonyms never appear together in a botanical name.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pikevi View Post
I am just wondering if one sees an ID tag with a syn. written which name we one should assume as the current name ( the name of tom499's orchid became [Dendrobium furcatum] from [Dendrobium amabile syn furcatum].
If you see a tag like tom499's with "syn" on it you simply have to go do your homework and find out what the correct name of the plant is. Writing this sort of thing on a tag is erroneous to begin with so you can't tell by looking at the tag which is the proper name. Your only choice is to look it up in an authoritative text or better yet in Monocots Checklist of Species.
__________________
Reply With Quote