Thread: Soph. purpurata
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2007, 01:29 PM
Cynthia, Prescott, AZ's Avatar
Cynthia, Prescott, AZ Cynthia, Prescott, AZ is offline
Super Moderator Photobucket
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,686
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Cynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia, Prescott, AZ has a reputation beyond repute
I believe the situation IS that you can argue over the genetics. There is very little difference in the genes, and there are a great many, so that the choice of section of gene to base genus changes on is questionable. This is probably why they have lump so many together. There really isn't the clear cut differences that we would have hoped for. They should have waited until their work on the various regions of the genes was more comprehensive. My preference would have been to put the Mexican Laelias into Laelia, and refer to every other Laelia as Pseudolaelia, and leave the Sophs alone.
__________________
Cynthia

Prescott Orchid Society
Reply With Quote