View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2007, 06:23 AM
kmarch's Avatar
kmarch kmarch is offline
Chief Of Staff
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 5,159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
kmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud ofkmarch has much to be proud of
mayres, My light stands were not in a windowless basement but neither was it in a window, so no direct light and I'd say only a little indirect light. I would say the florescent light was the primary source with the natural light being supplimental. I did use timers to carefully control the number of hours of light, 14 hrs in winter, up to 16 in summer so maybe what you suggested, happened. Maybe what I lost in intensity, I made up for in length of "daylight."

The addage "you learn somethign new every day" applies here. Even after 10+ years of growing, I did not know, nor had I ever heard, the intensity/length-of-day question you posed. It never occured to me you might compensate for an intensity deficit by lengthening the "day."

It's quite interesting.....
Reply With Quote